[Functional urology during COVID-19: Recommendations during de-escalation.] / La urología funcional en la era COVID-19. Consejos para la desescalada.

OBJECTIVES: Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, all surgical activity that was not life threatening was cancelled , as well as most face-to-face consultations. Currently the beginning of the de-escalation phases that will led us to a new normal, forces us to establish some degree of priority in the interventions as well as in the medical consultations. Our objective is to establish some recommendation on Functional Urology office visits and surgical interventions that serve as a tool to facilitate decision-making. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Experts in Functional Urology from different autonomous communities of Spain were contacted to design a strategy to reorganize the activity of both, diagnosis and treatment. A modified nominal group technique has been used due to the extraordinary restrictions of assembly and mobility during the COVID pandemic. The first signer (EMC) made the first draft with the measures adopted and the strategy to be followed during the evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic. The proposal was sent to the rest of the authors, in order to unify criteria and experiences to reach a quick consensus on the relative priority of the different activities, problems and solutions. A final version was approved by all authors May 27, 2020. RESULTS: Tables of recommendation have been prepared for outpatient consultation, surgical and technical interventions, according to de-escalation phases proposed by the Spanish Associations of Surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: The change that COVID-19 Pandemich as involved in our clinical practice force us to seek alternative methods to treat our patients, some of which may already be established. Mean while, a consensusin decision making is necessary. Documents such as the current one, are intended to guide the management of patients with urological functional pathology in exceptional situations. Logically, it should be adapted to material and human availability, and to the idiosyncrasy of each Urology service.

OBJETIVOS: Debido a la Pandemia COVID-19 se suspendió toda actividad quirúrgica que no fuera una urgencia vital, así como la mayoría de consultas presenciales. Actualmente el inicio de las fases dedesescalada que nos llevarán a una nueva normalidad nos obliga a establecer unos grados de prioridad en las intervenciones así como en las consultas médicas. Nuestro objetivo es establecer una serie de recomendaciones sobre las consultas de Urología Funcional y las intervenciones quirúrgicas que sirva como herramientade ayuda en la toma de decisiones.MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Expertos en Urología Funcionalde distintas comunidades autónomas de España fueron contactados para diseñar una estrategia parareorganizar la actividad tanto de diagnóstico como de tratamiento. Se ha utilizado una técnica de grupo nominal modificada debido a las restricciones extraordinarias de reunión y movilidad durante la pandemia COVID. El primer firmante (EMC) realizó el primer borrado rcon las medidas adoptadas y la estrategia a seguir durante la evolución de la pandemia COVID19. Se remitió la propuesta al resto de autores, con el fin de unificar criterios y experiencias para llegar a un rápido consenso sobre la importancia relativa de las distintas actividades, problemas y soluciones. Se realizó una versión definitiva, aprobada por todos los autores, el día 27 de mayo de 2020. RESULTADOS: Se han elaborado tablas de recomendaciones tanto para consultas externas, como para intervenciones quirúrgicas y técnicas, de acuerdo con las fases de desescalada propuestas por la Asociación Española de Cirujanos (AEC). CONCLUSIONES: El cambio que ha supuesto la Pandemia COVID-19 en nuestra práctica clínica nos obliga a buscar métodos alternativos para seguir y tratar a nuestros pacientes, algunos de los cuales pueden ya quedar instaurados. Mientras, es necesario un consenso en la toma de decisiones. Documentos como el actual, pretenden orientar en el manejo de los pacientes con patología funcional urológica en situaciones excepcionales. Lógicamente, deberá adaptarse alas disponibilidades materiales y humanas, y a la idiosincrasia de cada servicio de Urología.

La urología funcional en la era COVID-19. Consejos para la desescalada / Functional urology during COVID-19: Recommendations during de-escalation

OBJETIVOS: Debido a la Pandemia COVID-19 se suspendió toda actividad quirúrgica que no fuera una urgencia vital, así como la mayoría de consultas presenciales. Actualmente el inicio de las fases dedesescalada que nos llevarán a una nueva normalidad nos obliga a establecer unos grados de prioridad en las intervenciones así como en las consultas médicas. Nuestro objetivo es establecer una serie de recomendaciones sobre las consultas de Urología Funcional y las intervenciones quirúrgicas que sirva como herramientade ayuda en la toma de decisiones. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Expertos en Urología Funcionalde distintas comunidades autónomas de España fueron contactados para diseñar una estrategia parareorganizar la actividad tanto de diagnóstico como de tratamiento. Se ha utilizado una técnica de grupo nominal modificada debido a las restricciones extraordinarias de reunión y movilidad durante la pandemia COVID. El primer firmante (EMC) realizó el primer borrado rcon las medidas adoptadas y la estrategia a seguir durante la evolución de la pandemia COVID19. Se remitió la propuesta al resto de autores, con el fin de unificar criterios y experiencias para llegar a un rápido consenso sobre la importancia relativa de las distintas actividades, problemas y soluciones. Se realizó una versión definitiva, aprobada por todos los autores, el día 27 de mayo de 2020. RESULTADOS: Se han elaborado tablas de recomendaciones tanto para consultas externas, como para intervenciones quirúrgicas y técnicas, de acuerdo con las fases de desescalada propuestas por la Asociación Española de Cirujanos (AEC). CONCLUSIONES: El cambio que ha supuesto la Pandemia COVID-19 en nuestra práctica clínica nos obliga a buscar métodos alternativos para seguir y tratar a nuestros pacientes, algunos de los cuales pueden ya quedar instaurados. Mientras, es necesario un consenso en la toma de decisiones. Documentos como el actual, pretenden orientar en el manejo de los pacientes con patología funcional urológica en situaciones excepcionales. Lógicamente, deberá adaptarse alas disponibilidades materiales y humanas, y a la idiosincrasia de cada servicio de Urología

OBJECTIVES: Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, all surgical activity that was not life threatening was cancelled, as well as most face-to-face consultations. Currently the beginning of the de-escalation phases that will led us to a new normal, forces us to establish some degree of priority in the interventions as well as in the medical consultations. Our objective is to establish some recommendation on Functional Urology office visits and surgical interventions that serve as a tool to facilitate decision-making. MATERIAL AND METHODS: experts in Functional Urology from different autonomous communities of Spain were contacted to design a strategy to reorganize the activity of both, diagnosis and treatment. A modified nominal group technique has been used due to the extraordinary restrictions of assembly and mobility during the COVID pandemic. The first signer (EMC) made the first draft with the measures adopted and the strategy to be followed during the evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic. The proposal was sent to the rest of the authors, in order to unify criteria and experiences to reach a quick consensus on the relative priority of the different activities, problems and solutions. A final version was approved by all authors May 27, 2020. RESULTS: tables of recommendation have been prepared for outpatient consultation, surgical and technical interventions, according to de-escalation phases proposed by the Spanish Associations of Surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: The change that COVID-19 Pandemic has involved in our clinical practice force us to seek alternative methods to treat our patients, some of which may already be established. Meanwhile, a consensus in decision making is necessary. Documents such as the current one, are intended to guide the management of patients with urological functional pathology in exceptional situations. Logically, it should be adapted to material and human availability, and to the idiosyncrasy of each Urology service

Consensus document on the multidisciplinary management of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction in patients with multiple sclerosis.

AIM: Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) is very common in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Early diagnosis and treatment are crucial to avoid irreversible damage and improve quality of life. Our aim was to develop recommendations to improve NLUTD identification in MS patients, along with their referral and management. METHODS: A multidisciplinary group of 14 experts in the management of patients with MS and NLUTD (nine urologists, three neurologists, and two rehabilitators) was selected. A comprehensive review of the literature was undertaken and a set of recommendations was generated and submitted to a Delphi panel of 114 experts. Recommendations were presented according to the grade of agreement (GA). RESULTS: Early diagnosis in asymptomatic patients with risk factors for complications is recommended (GA 94%). Postvoid residual volume should be measured if changes in urinary symptoms (GA 87%), preferably ultrasound-guided (GA 86%). Early referral to urologist is recommended if urinary incontinence (GA 91%), significant post-void residual volume (94%), quality of life impairment (GA 98%) and recurrent urinary infections (GA 97%). The initial evaluation should include physical examination (GA 99%) and urodynamics including cystometry (GA 89%), pressure-flow study (90%) and electromyography (GA 70%). The panel recommends multidisciplinary collaboration (GA 100%) with a rehabilitation specialist and trained nurses in the management of NLUTD (GA 99%). CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary management for patients with NLUTD due to MS is advised, including urologists, neurologists, rehabilitation, and nurses. Panel recommends early diagnosis with post-void residual volume in symptomatic patients before referring to urologist and urodynamics when referred.

[Cystocele and stress urinary incontinence associated with lower urinary tract obstruction]. / Incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo asociada a obstrucción del tracto urinario inferior en el cistocele.

OBJECTIVES: The association of stress urinary incontinence secondary to urethral hypermobility and lower urinary tract obstruction in the same patient with cystocele is rare, and even represents a contradiction. The objective of our work is to treat to define the characteristics that identify this entity, in comparison with isolated stress urinary incontinence or lower urinary tract obstruction in patients with cystocele. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study in 1168 cases of cystocele in which urodynamic studies were performed. All patients underwent history and neurological and uro-gynecologycal physical examination. The urodynamic study included uroflowmetry, cystomanometry, voiding pressure/flow tests and voiding cystourethrograms. All data were collected in an Excel 2000 database and statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS software. RESULTS: A- General data: 25 cases qualified for the study in group I (isolated stress urinary incontinence with urethral hypermobility); 24 cases in group II (lower urinary tract obstruction); and 14 cases in group III (astress urinary incontinence associated with lower urinary tract obstruction). The proportion of each group in the whole group of cystoceles corresponded to a 4/1/0.05 ratio respectively. Mean age was 58.4 years for group I, 68.2 for group II and 71.2 for group III. A Statistically significant lower age was demonstrated for group I (p < 0.0005). B- The symptom "sensation of vaginal lump" was less frequent in group I (32%). A significant difference was demonstrated (p = 0.02). C- Group I showed a lower increase of daily voiding frequency (32%), p = 0.02. D- Group I showed less night-time voiding frequency (1 episode)(p < 0.04). E- Urinary incontinence with cough was less frequent in group 1 (84%) (p = 0.0004). F- Group I had more bladder capacity (243.6 ml) (p < 0.05).G- Group I showed less urethral resistances (URA = 37.9 cm H2O) (p = 0.01). H- W80-W20 was higher in group I: 1.3 W/m2 (p < 0.05). I- The symptom "sensation of vaginal lump appeared more often in group II (70.8%) (p = 0.02). J- Radiological degree of cystocele was greater in group II1 (1.7) (p < 0.05). K- Detrusor hyperactivity was more frequent in group III (64.3%) (p = 0.00009). L- No significant differences were found between groups II-III when comparing type of obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: The group of isolated stress urinary incontinence (group I) is characterized by a younger age, less frequency of sensation of vaginal lump, less daily frequency and nocturia, and urodynamic data of greater bladder capacity, lower urethral resistance and normal detrusor contractility. The group of isolated lower urinary tract obstruction (group II) could be characterized by a more frequent sensation of vaginal lump and increase of the radiological cystocele. The group of stress urinary incontinence associated with lower urinary tract obstruction had a higher percentage of cases of detrusor hyperactivity. All these data might enable a proper identification of different risk elements in the groups.

Incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo asociada a obstrucción del tracto urinario en el cistocele / Cystocele and stress urinary incontinence associated with lower urinary tract obstruction

Objetivo: La asociación de incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo por hipermovilidad uretral y obstrucción del tracto urinario inferior en un mismo paciente con cistocele, es rara, e incluso presenta una apariencia contradictoria. El objetivo de nuestro trabajo consistiría en tratar de definir las características que permitieran identificar a esta entidad, frente a la incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo y obstrucción del tracto urinario inferior aisladas, en pacientes con cistocele. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo en 1.116 de casos de cistocele sometidos a investigación urodinámica. Todas las pacientes fueron sometidas a historia clínica, exploración física neurourológica y uroginecológica. El estudio urodinámico consistió en una flujometría, cistomanometría, test presión detrusor/flujo miccional y cistouretrografías. Se recogieron los datos en el programa Excel 2000 y el tratamiento estadístico se realizó con el paquete SPSS. Resultados: A – Datos generales: Se clasificaron para este estudio en el grupo I (incontinencia de esfuerzo aislada por hipermovilidad uretral) 25 casos; en el grupo II (obstrucción tracto urinario inferior) 24 casos; y en el grupo III (incontinencia urinaria esfuerzo asociada a obstrucción tracto urinario inferior) 14 casos. La proporción de los tres grupos en la totalidad de los cistoceles, correspondió a una relación 4/1/0.05 para los grupos I-II-III respectivamente. La edad media correspondió a 58.4 años para grupo I, 68.2 para grupo II y 71.2 para el grupo III. Se demostró una diferencia significativa de menor edad para el grupo I (p<0.0005). B – El síntoma de sensación de bulto en vagina fue menor en el grupo I (32 %); se demostró una diferencia significativa de (p=0.02); C – El incremento de la frecuencia miccional diurna fue menor en el grupo I (32 %) p=0.02. D – La frecuencia miccional nocturna fue menor en el grupo I (1 episodio) (p<0.004). E – El síntoma de incontinencia urinaria a la tos fue más frecuente en el grupo I (84 %) (p=0.0004). F – Fue mayor en el grupo I la capacidad vesical (243.6 ml.) (p<0.05). G – El URA fue menor en el grupo I, con un valor de 37.9 cm. H2O (p=0.01). H – El W80-W20 fue mayor en el grupo I: 1.3W/m2 p<0.05. y mayor en el grupo II (70.8 %) (p=0.02). I – El grado radiológico de cistocele fue mayor en el grupo II (1.7) (p<0.05). J – La hiperactividad del detrusor fue más frecuente en el grupo III (64.3 %) (p=0.00009). K – No se demostraron diferencias significativas en el tipo de obstrucción entre los grupos II-III. Conclusiones: El grupo de incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo aislada (grupo I) se caracterizaría por una menor edad, con una menor frecuencia de sensación de bulto en vagina, menor frecuencia miccional diurna y nocturna y unos datos urodinámicos de mayor capacidad vesical, menor resistencia uretral y contractilidad normal del detrusor. El grupo de obstrucción aislada del tracto urinario inferior (grupo II) se caracterizaría por una mayor frecuencia de bulto en vagina, e incremento del grado de cistocele radiológico. El grupo de incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo asociada a obstrucción del tracto urinario inferior, se acompañó de un mayor porcentaje de casos de hiperactividad del detrusor. Todos estos datos podrían permitir la correcta identificación de los diferentes elementos de riesgo, en los distintos grupos (AU)

Objectives: The association of stress urinary incontinence secondary to urethral hypermobility and lower urinary tract obstruction in the same patient with cystocele is rare, and even represents a contradiction. The objective of our work is to treat to define the characteristics that identify this entity, in comparison with isolated stress urinary incontinence or lower urinary tract obstruction in patients with cystocele. Methods: We performed a retrospective study in 1168 cases of cystocele in which urodynamic studies were performed. All patients underwent history and neurological and uro-gynecologycal physical examination. The urodynamic study included uroflowmetry, cystomanometry, voiding pressure/flow tests and voiding cystourethrograms. All data were collected in an Excel 2000 database and statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS software. Results: A- General data: 25 cases qualified for the study in group I (isolated stress urinary incontinence with urethral hypermobility); 24 cases in group II (lower urinary tract obstruction); and 14 cases in group III (astress urinary incontinence associated with lower urinary tract obstruction). The proportion of each group in the whole group of cystoceles corresponded to a 4/1/0.05 ratio respectively. Mean age was 58.4 years for group I, 68.2 for group II and 71.2 for group III. A Statistically significant lower age was demonstrated for group I (p < 0.0005). B-The symptom “sensation of vaginal lump” was less frequent in group I (32%). A significant difference was demonstrated (p = 0.02). C- Group I showed a lower increase of daily voiding frequency (32%), p = 0.02. D- Group I showed less night-time voiding frequency (1 episode)(p < 0.04).E-Urinary incontinence with cough was less frequent in group I (84%) (p = 0.0004). F- Group I had more bladder capacity (243.6 ml) (p < 0.05).G-Group I showed less urethral resistances (URA = 37.9 cm H2O) (p = 0.01). H- W80-W20 was higher in group I: 1.3 W/m2 (p < 0.05). I-The symptom “sensation of vaginal lump appeared more often in group II (70.8%) (p = 0.02). J-Radiological degree of cystocele was greater in group II (1.7) (p< 0.05). K- Detrusor hyperactivity was more frequent in group III (64.3%) (p = 0.00009). L- No significant differences were found between groups II-III when comparing type of obstruction. Conclusions: The group of isolated stress urinary incontinence (group I) is characterized by a younger age, less frequency of sensation of vaginal lump, less daily frequency and nocturia, and urodynamic data of greater bladder capacity, lower urethral resistance and normal detrusor contractility. The group of isolated lower urinary tract obstruction (group II) could be characterized by a more frequent sensation of vaginal lump and increase of the radiological cystocele. The group of stress urinary incontinence associated with lower urinary tract obstruction had a higher percentage of cases of detrusor hyperactivity. All these data might enable a proper identification of different risk elements in the groups (AU)